policy/v2: separate exit node and 0.0.0.0/0 routes (#2578)
* policy: add tests for route auto approval Reproduce #2568 Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com> * policy/v2: separate exit node and 0.0.0.0/0 routes Fixes #2568 Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
377b854dd8
commit
37dc0dad35
4 changed files with 873 additions and 40 deletions
|
@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ type PolicyManager struct {
|
|||
tagOwnerMapHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
tagOwnerMap map[Tag]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
|
||||
exitSetHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
exitSet *netipx.IPSet
|
||||
autoApproveMapHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
autoApproveMap map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -97,7 +99,7 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) updateLocked() (bool, error) {
|
|||
pm.tagOwnerMap = tagMap
|
||||
pm.tagOwnerMapHash = tagOwnerMapHash
|
||||
|
||||
autoMap, err := resolveAutoApprovers(pm.pol, pm.users, pm.nodes)
|
||||
autoMap, exitSet, err := resolveAutoApprovers(pm.pol, pm.users, pm.nodes)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, fmt.Errorf("resolving auto approvers map: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -107,8 +109,13 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) updateLocked() (bool, error) {
|
|||
pm.autoApproveMap = autoMap
|
||||
pm.autoApproveMapHash = autoApproveMapHash
|
||||
|
||||
exitSetHash := deephash.Hash(&autoMap)
|
||||
exitSetChanged := exitSetHash != pm.exitSetHash
|
||||
pm.exitSet = exitSet
|
||||
pm.exitSetHash = exitSetHash
|
||||
|
||||
// If neither of the calculated values changed, no need to update nodes
|
||||
if !filterChanged && !tagOwnerChanged && !autoApproveChanged {
|
||||
if !filterChanged && !tagOwnerChanged && !autoApproveChanged && !exitSetChanged {
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -207,6 +214,23 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) NodeCanApproveRoute(node *types.Node, route netip.Prefi
|
|||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the route to-be-approved is an exit route, then we need to check
|
||||
// if the node is in allowed to approve it. This is treated differently
|
||||
// than the auto-approvers, as the auto-approvers are not allowed to
|
||||
// approve the whole /0 range.
|
||||
// However, an auto approver might be /0, meaning that they can approve
|
||||
// all routes available, just not exit nodes.
|
||||
if tsaddr.IsExitRoute(route) {
|
||||
if pm.exitSet == nil {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
if slices.ContainsFunc(node.IPs(), pm.exitSet.Contains) {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pm.mu.Lock()
|
||||
defer pm.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -224,14 +248,6 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) NodeCanApproveRoute(node *types.Node, route netip.Prefi
|
|||
// cannot just lookup in the prefix map and have to check
|
||||
// if there is a "parent" prefix available.
|
||||
for prefix, approveAddrs := range pm.autoApproveMap {
|
||||
// We do not want the exit node entry to approve all
|
||||
// sorts of routes. The logic here is that it would be
|
||||
// unexpected behaviour to have specific routes approved
|
||||
// just because the node is allowed to designate itself as
|
||||
// an exit.
|
||||
if tsaddr.IsExitRoute(prefix) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if prefix is larger (so containing) and then overlaps
|
||||
// the route to see if the node can approve a subset of an autoapprover
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue