policy/v2: separate exit node and 0.0.0.0/0 routes (#2578)
* policy: add tests for route auto approval Reproduce #2568 Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com> * policy/v2: separate exit node and 0.0.0.0/0 routes Fixes #2568 Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
377b854dd8
commit
37dc0dad35
4 changed files with 873 additions and 40 deletions
|
@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ type PolicyManager struct {
|
|||
tagOwnerMapHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
tagOwnerMap map[Tag]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
|
||||
exitSetHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
exitSet *netipx.IPSet
|
||||
autoApproveMapHash deephash.Sum
|
||||
autoApproveMap map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -97,7 +99,7 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) updateLocked() (bool, error) {
|
|||
pm.tagOwnerMap = tagMap
|
||||
pm.tagOwnerMapHash = tagOwnerMapHash
|
||||
|
||||
autoMap, err := resolveAutoApprovers(pm.pol, pm.users, pm.nodes)
|
||||
autoMap, exitSet, err := resolveAutoApprovers(pm.pol, pm.users, pm.nodes)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, fmt.Errorf("resolving auto approvers map: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -107,8 +109,13 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) updateLocked() (bool, error) {
|
|||
pm.autoApproveMap = autoMap
|
||||
pm.autoApproveMapHash = autoApproveMapHash
|
||||
|
||||
exitSetHash := deephash.Hash(&autoMap)
|
||||
exitSetChanged := exitSetHash != pm.exitSetHash
|
||||
pm.exitSet = exitSet
|
||||
pm.exitSetHash = exitSetHash
|
||||
|
||||
// If neither of the calculated values changed, no need to update nodes
|
||||
if !filterChanged && !tagOwnerChanged && !autoApproveChanged {
|
||||
if !filterChanged && !tagOwnerChanged && !autoApproveChanged && !exitSetChanged {
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -207,6 +214,23 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) NodeCanApproveRoute(node *types.Node, route netip.Prefi
|
|||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the route to-be-approved is an exit route, then we need to check
|
||||
// if the node is in allowed to approve it. This is treated differently
|
||||
// than the auto-approvers, as the auto-approvers are not allowed to
|
||||
// approve the whole /0 range.
|
||||
// However, an auto approver might be /0, meaning that they can approve
|
||||
// all routes available, just not exit nodes.
|
||||
if tsaddr.IsExitRoute(route) {
|
||||
if pm.exitSet == nil {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
if slices.ContainsFunc(node.IPs(), pm.exitSet.Contains) {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pm.mu.Lock()
|
||||
defer pm.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -224,14 +248,6 @@ func (pm *PolicyManager) NodeCanApproveRoute(node *types.Node, route netip.Prefi
|
|||
// cannot just lookup in the prefix map and have to check
|
||||
// if there is a "parent" prefix available.
|
||||
for prefix, approveAddrs := range pm.autoApproveMap {
|
||||
// We do not want the exit node entry to approve all
|
||||
// sorts of routes. The logic here is that it would be
|
||||
// unexpected behaviour to have specific routes approved
|
||||
// just because the node is allowed to designate itself as
|
||||
// an exit.
|
||||
if tsaddr.IsExitRoute(prefix) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if prefix is larger (so containing) and then overlaps
|
||||
// the route to see if the node can approve a subset of an autoapprover
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -862,10 +862,11 @@ type AutoApproverPolicy struct {
|
|||
// resolveAutoApprovers resolves the AutoApprovers to a map of netip.Prefix to netipx.IPSet.
|
||||
// The resulting map can be used to quickly look up if a node can self-approve a route.
|
||||
// It is intended for internal use in a PolicyManager.
|
||||
func resolveAutoApprovers(p *Policy, users types.Users, nodes types.Nodes) (map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet, error) {
|
||||
func resolveAutoApprovers(p *Policy, users types.Users, nodes types.Nodes) (map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet, *netipx.IPSet, error) {
|
||||
if p == nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil
|
||||
return nil, nil, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
var err error
|
||||
|
||||
routes := make(map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSetBuilder)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -877,7 +878,7 @@ func resolveAutoApprovers(p *Policy, users types.Users, nodes types.Nodes) (map[
|
|||
aa, ok := autoApprover.(Alias)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
// Should never happen
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("autoApprover %v is not an Alias", autoApprover)
|
||||
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("autoApprover %v is not an Alias", autoApprover)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If it does not resolve, that means the autoApprover is not associated with any IP addresses.
|
||||
ips, _ := aa.Resolve(p, users, nodes)
|
||||
|
@ -891,7 +892,7 @@ func resolveAutoApprovers(p *Policy, users types.Users, nodes types.Nodes) (map[
|
|||
aa, ok := autoApprover.(Alias)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
// Should never happen
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("autoApprover %v is not an Alias", autoApprover)
|
||||
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("autoApprover %v is not an Alias", autoApprover)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If it does not resolve, that means the autoApprover is not associated with any IP addresses.
|
||||
ips, _ := aa.Resolve(p, users, nodes)
|
||||
|
@ -903,22 +904,20 @@ func resolveAutoApprovers(p *Policy, users types.Users, nodes types.Nodes) (map[
|
|||
for prefix, builder := range routes {
|
||||
ipSet, err := builder.IPSet()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret[prefix] = ipSet
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var exitNodeSet *netipx.IPSet
|
||||
if len(p.AutoApprovers.ExitNode) > 0 {
|
||||
exitNodeSet, err := exitNodeSetBuilder.IPSet()
|
||||
exitNodeSet, err = exitNodeSetBuilder.IPSet()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret[tsaddr.AllIPv4()] = exitNodeSet
|
||||
ret[tsaddr.AllIPv6()] = exitNodeSet
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret, nil
|
||||
return ret, exitNodeSet, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type ACL struct {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1024,10 +1024,11 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
policy *Policy
|
||||
want map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
wantErr bool
|
||||
name string
|
||||
policy *Policy
|
||||
want map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes *netipx.IPSet
|
||||
wantErr bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "single-route",
|
||||
|
@ -1041,7 +1042,8 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{
|
||||
mp("10.0.0.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: nil,
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "multiple-routes",
|
||||
|
@ -1057,7 +1059,8 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
mp("10.0.0.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
mp("10.0.1.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.2/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: nil,
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "exit-node",
|
||||
|
@ -1066,11 +1069,9 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
ExitNode: AutoApprovers{ptr.To(Username("user1@"))},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv4(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv6(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{},
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "group-route",
|
||||
|
@ -1087,7 +1088,8 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{
|
||||
mp("10.0.0.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32", "100.64.0.2/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: nil,
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "tag-route-and-exit",
|
||||
|
@ -1113,10 +1115,9 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{
|
||||
mp("10.0.1.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.4/32"),
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv4(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.5/32"),
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv6(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.5/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: mustIPSet("100.64.0.5/32"),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "mixed-routes-and-exit-nodes",
|
||||
|
@ -1135,10 +1136,9 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
want: map[netip.Prefix]*netipx.IPSet{
|
||||
mp("10.0.0.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32", "100.64.0.2/32"),
|
||||
mp("10.0.1.0/24"): mustIPSet("100.64.0.3/32"),
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv4(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
tsaddr.AllIPv6(): mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
wantAllIPRoutes: mustIPSet("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
for _, tt := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
got, err := resolveAutoApprovers(tt.policy, users, nodes)
|
||||
got, gotAllIPRoutes, err := resolveAutoApprovers(tt.policy, users, nodes)
|
||||
if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("resolveAutoApprovers() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
@ -1154,6 +1154,15 @@ func TestResolveAutoApprovers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.want, got, cmps...); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("resolveAutoApprovers() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if tt.wantAllIPRoutes != nil {
|
||||
if gotAllIPRoutes == nil {
|
||||
t.Error("resolveAutoApprovers() expected non-nil allIPRoutes, got nil")
|
||||
} else if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.wantAllIPRoutes, gotAllIPRoutes, cmps...); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("resolveAutoApprovers() allIPRoutes mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if gotAllIPRoutes != nil {
|
||||
t.Error("resolveAutoApprovers() expected nil allIPRoutes, got non-nil")
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue